From the blog
What Constitutes a Bad Faith Insurance Denial for a Roof Claim in Tennessee?

A bad faith insurance denial in Tennessee occurs when an insurer refuses to pay a valid roof damage claim without a reasonable basis, misrepresents policy terms, or unreasonably delays investigation and payment. Under Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-7-105, homeowners who prove bad faith can recover the full amount of the claim plus a penalty of up to 25% of the loss, on top of attorney's fees in some cases. Understanding the specific legal standards that apply to roof claims in Nashville, Franklin, Brentwood, Murfreesboro, and Hendersonville gives homeowners leverage when an insurer stalls or lowballs a legitimate wind, hail, or storm damage claim.
Tennessee's Legal Framework for Insurance Claims
Tennessee regulates insurance claim handling through two primary sources: the Tennessee Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act (Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 56-8-104 to 56-8-113) and the state's bad faith statute (Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-7-105). The Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act, along with implementing regulations at Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 0780-01-05, sets procedural obligations insurers must follow, including timely acknowledgment of claims, prompt investigation, and clear written communication about coverage decisions.
The bad faith statute is the enforcement mechanism. It does not create new duties, but it penalizes insurers that violate their contractual and regulatory obligations in a way that is not "in good faith." For roof claims specifically, this framework matters because insurers frequently dispute causation (storm damage versus wear and tear), scope (partial repair versus full replacement), and matching (whether undamaged slopes must be replaced to match new shingles on damaged slopes).
The Elements of a Bad Faith Claim Under Tennessee Law
To prevail on a bad faith claim under Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-7-105, a Tennessee homeowner must generally establish five elements:
- A valid, enforceable insurance policy was in effect at the time of the roof damage.
- The loss is covered under the policy's terms, meaning the damage falls within the scope of perils insured against, such as wind or hail.
- A proper demand for payment was made, typically through the filing of a claim and submission of proof of loss.
- The insurer refused to pay within 60 days of the demand, and the refusal was not made in good faith.
- The insurer had the ability to pay the claim at the time of refusal.
The 60-day window is critical and frequently misunderstood. It does not mean an insurer has 60 days to make any decision at all; it means that if 60 days pass after a proper demand without payment, and the refusal is found to lack a good faith basis, the statutory penalty becomes available. Tennessee courts have interpreted "bad faith" as more than a wrong decision. It requires a showing that the insurer's refusal was not based on a genuine, reasonable dispute over coverage or value, but on an unjustified or unreasonable position.
How Long Does an Insurance Company Have to Settle a Claim in TN?
Tennessee's unfair claims settlement regulations impose specific procedural deadlines that apply before the bad faith statute's 60-day trigger comes into play. These deadlines create a paper trail that homeowners can use to document delay or evasion.
| Claim Stage | Tennessee Requirement | Legal Citation |
|---|---|---|
| Acknowledgment of claim | Within 14 working days of notification | Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 0780-01-05-.06 |
| Investigation completion | Within 30 days of notification, absent a documented reason for delay | Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 0780-01-05-.06 |
| Written explanation if claim is denied | Must be provided in writing, citing the specific policy provision | Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 0780-01-05-.06 |
| Payment after agreement on amount | Within a reasonable time; unreasonable delay is a deceptive practice | Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-8-105 |
| Bad faith penalty eligibility | 60 days after proper demand with no good-faith refusal | Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-7-105 |
If an insurer misses the 14-day acknowledgment window or fails to complete an investigation within 30 days without a documented justification, that failure alone is not automatically bad faith, but it is admissible evidence of an unreasonable claims process. Stacking multiple procedural failures, missed deadlines, unreturned calls, repeated requests for duplicate documentation, strengthens a homeowner's position considerably if the claim ultimately proceeds to litigation.
Common Bad Faith Tactics in Roof Damage Claims
Roof claims present unique friction points because damage assessment often depends on inspection quality and interpretation of policy language around matching and depreciation. Tactics that Tennessee courts and the Department of Commerce and Insurance have identified as evidence of bad faith include:
- Denying a claim without a physical or aerial inspection, relying instead on satellite imagery or a desk review that contradicts on-site evidence of hail bruising or wind-lifted shingles.
- Misapplying policy exclusions, such as labeling storm damage as "wear and tear" or "manufacturer defect" without supporting evidence.
- Lowballing the estimate using outdated pricing or omitting necessary line items like ice-and-water shield, drip edge, or code-required upgrades.
- Refusing full slope replacement for matching when Tennessee's insurance regulations and many policies require reasonable uniformity of appearance.
- Unreasonable delay tactics, including repeated re-inspections, unreturned adjuster calls, or requests for the same documentation multiple times.
- Misrepresenting policy terms to the homeowner, such as claiming a deductible applies when it does not, or misquoting the actual cash value versus replacement cost provisions.
Any single instance of a disputed estimate is not automatically bad faith; insurers are entitled to reasonably dispute scope and cost. The legal exposure arises when the insurer's position is not supported by its own investigation, or when it ignores contrary evidence a reasonable insurer would have considered.
Documentation That Strengthens Your Position
Homeowners have significant leverage when their claim file includes independent, dated, and detailed evidence that contradicts an insurer's denial or lowball offer. The strongest documentation includes:
- A drone roof inspection report from a licensed contractor, showing high-resolution imagery of hail impact, granule loss, and wind damage with GPS-tagged locations on the roof plane.
- A written scope of work from a GAF Master Elite installer that itemizes materials, code requirements, and labor, allowing direct comparison against the insurer's estimate line by line.
- Weather data corroborating a specific storm date, including NOAA hail and wind reports for the property's ZIP code.
- Timestamped correspondence with the adjuster, including emails, claim portal messages, and call logs noting dates and the substance of each conversation.
- The insurer's written estimate (often generated in Xactimate), preserved in its original form so any later revisions can be compared.
This documentation matters twice over: it supports a legitimate claim on its merits, and it becomes the evidentiary record if the claim escalates into a bad faith dispute. An insurer that receives a detailed, professionally documented estimate and still denies or underpays without addressing the specifics has a much harder time arguing its refusal was reasonable.
What To Do If You Suspect Bad Faith
Homeowners who believe an insurer is acting in bad faith on a roof claim should take these steps in order:
- Request the denial or lowball offer in writing, citing the specific policy language the insurer relies on.
- Obtain an independent estimate from a licensed local roofing contractor to compare against the insurer's figures.
- Send a formal written demand referencing the independent estimate and requesting payment, which starts the 60-day clock under Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-7-105.
- File a complaint with the Tennessee Department of Commerce and Insurance if procedural deadlines under the Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act were missed.
- Consult a Tennessee attorney who handles first-party insurance bad faith litigation if the 60-day period passes without a good faith resolution.
Most roof claim disputes resolve before litigation once an insurer is presented with a thorough, documented estimate and a clear demand letter. Litigation becomes necessary only when the insurer's refusal persists despite credible, contrary evidence.
Bad Faith Insurance Claim FAQ
What is the penalty for bad faith insurance denial in Tennessee?
Under Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-7-105, a court can award up to 25% of the amount of the loss as a penalty in addition to the underlying claim amount, if the insurer's refusal to pay was found to lack good faith and the insurer had the ability to pay.
How long does an insurance company have to settle a claim in TN?
Insurers must acknowledge a claim within 14 working days and generally complete their investigation within 30 days under Tennessee's unfair claims settlement regulations. The bad faith statute's penalty becomes available if the insurer has not paid within 60 days of a proper demand and the refusal was not in good faith.
Can I sue my insurance company for denying my roof claim?
Yes, if the denial was not based on a reasonable, good faith investigation and the elements of Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-7-105 are met, homeowners can pursue a bad faith claim in addition to the breach of contract claim for the underlying policy proceeds.
Does filing a complaint with the Tennessee Department of Commerce and Insurance help my claim?
A regulatory complaint can prompt the insurer to reexamine the file and creates an official record of procedural violations, but it does not award damages directly. It is a useful supplement to, not a substitute for, a formal written demand or legal action.
Does a low estimate from my insurer automatically count as bad faith?
No. Insurers are permitted to reasonably dispute scope and pricing. Bad faith requires evidence that the insurer's position ignored its own investigation findings, contrary documentation, or established policy obligations, not merely that the homeowner disagrees with the amount offered.